Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709156›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Patient-reported actions following receipt of pathogenic hereditary cancer genetic test results: results from a population-based screening study in primary care.

Faith A Beers, Tesla N Theoryn, Emerson J Dusic, Heather M Harris, Sarah Knerr, DaLaina Cameron, Susan B Trinidad, Barbara M Norquist, Michael L Raff, Jeannine M Brant and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Faith A BeersDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. fabeers@uw.edu.ORCID 0009-0007-0952-9938
Tesla N TheorynDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Emerson J DusicDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Heather M HarrisDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sarah KnerrDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
DaLaina CameronDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Susan B TrinidadDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Barbara M NorquistDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Michael L RaffMedical Genetics, Mary Bridge Children's, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, WA, 98405, USA.
Jeannine M BrantClinical Science & Innovation Department, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Deborah J BowenDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Elizabeth M SwisherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Catharine WangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02218, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1U01CA232795-01A1NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCATS/NIH National Institues of Health TL1-TR002318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing for hereditary cancer risk can improve health outcomes for individuals and their family members. Although the use of multiplex gene panels for cancer risk is expanding in the primary care setting, little is known about patient actions following such testing. We examine participant-reported actions around clinical follow-up and discuss cascade testing with family members after a pathogenic variant (PV) is identified.

methodsThirty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care patients who had a PV identified through the EDGE (Early Detection of GEnetic risk) study. Thematic analysis was used to explore participant-reported post-testing actions, followed by subgroup analysis by variant actionability.

resultsPatients reported working closely with providers to decide whether to change their cancer-related care and to consider the clinical implications of their test results. Although patients’ reported promotion of cascade testing did not differ by variant actionability, those with actionable variants spoke more often of family members completing cascade testing after they discussed it. Age, sex, cost, and competing priorities influenced the perceived relevance of genetic test results and the urgency of participant-reported post-testing actions.

conclusionsIn this primary care sample, the use of multiplex gene panel testing for cancer risk motivated clinical follow-up and the promotion of cascade testing.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingNeoplasmsPrimary Health CareAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFamilyFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedReturn of Individual Research ResultsCascade testingClinical follow-upFamily communicationGenetic testingHereditary cancerPathogenic variantsPatient decision-makingPopulation-based screeningPreventive carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID41709156
PMCPMC13020173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.