ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Ascertaining cause-specific emergency department demand using forecast combinations.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) overcrowding is a recurrent public health concern, which may be alleviated by forecasting ED visits. Numerous ED forecasting models exist, making it challenging for decision makers to select appropriate forecasts and plan under model and forecast uncertainty. It remains unclear whether incorporating environmental covariates as model predictors or aggregating cause-specific ED visit forecasts to obtain total ED visit forecasts can each contribute to improving forecast accuracy.
methodsTo address this gap, we developed a framework to generate accurate probabilistic forecasts using forecast combination schemes. We developed probabilistic forecast combinations schemes which can directly combine predictive distributions/quantiles in a linear/non-linear fashion, using static/dynamic weighting schemes. These schemes were tested in probabilistically forecasting cause-specific ED visits in Singapore, an equatorial city state. We incorporated a high-dimensional set of predictors to further augment model performance. We documented the forecast performance of all forecasting models across 1- to 12-week ahead horizons.
resultsOur study showed that aggregating cause-specific forecasts to provide all-cause ED visit forecasts can enhance overall ED visit forecasting performance—particularly for KNN, XGBoost, and Elastic Net. Forecast combinations, in particular, the linear opinion pool can lead to excellent and stable forecasts over all individual forecasts in 164 out of the 180 cause–horizon combinations examined. Within the considered forecast horizons, longer horizons led to more scenarios where forecast combinations outperformed individual models significantly (p < 0.05). Forecast combinations exhibited stable performance across forecast horizons, whereas individual models showed greater variability—some performed well at shorter horizons but deteriorated at longer ones, and vice versa. We also found that quantile forecast combinations can generate confident forecasts while maintaining good accuracy.
conclusionForecasting cause-specific ED visits can provide fine-scale forward guidance on resource optimization and ED crowding preparedness. Probabilistic forecast combinations can characterize the uncertainty of forecasts and hedge against model selection uncertainty in a robust manner. However, performance during COVID-19 was not assessed, which may limit generalizability under structural breaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.