Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709152›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026

Anesthesia clinicians' perspectives on peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in older adults.

Arissa M Torrie, Mark D Neuman, Sheila Sprague, Flavia K Borges, Mary Scott-Herring, Kellie Jaremko, Ron E Samet, Francesca Mulazzani, Nathan N O'Hara, Gerard P Slobogean and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arissa M TorrieDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. atorrie@som.umaryland.edu.
Mark D NeumanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sheila SpragueDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Flavia K BorgesDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mary Scott-HerringSchool of Nursing, Nurse Anesthesia Program, Edgewood University, Madison, WI, USA.
Kellie JaremkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ron E SametDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Francesca MulazzaniASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Nathan N O'HaraDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gerard P SlobogeanDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA, USA.
Survey Respondents

Funding

Development of orthopaedic surgeon-scientist expertise in patient-oriented researchK24AR076445 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Gerard Slobogean · 2020 to 2026
$1.1M
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases,United States K24AR076445NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR076445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have emerged as a promising pain management strategy for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to identify factors influencing PNB use and assess opinions on their effectiveness and implementation among physician anesthesiologists, certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), and certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAAs).

methodsA cross-sectional study surveyed physician anesthesiologists, CRNAs, and CAAs caring for adults aged 50 years and older with hip fractures from May 2024 to July 2024. The 22-item questionnaire explored demographics, PNB practices, perceived advantages, disadvantages, barriers to use, and interest in future research.

resultsA total of 185 surveys were returned: 94.5% from physician anesthesiologists, 4.9% from CRNAs, and 0.5% from a CAA. While 86% of respondents perceived PNBs as beneficial, 14% reported they were unsure or opposed the use of PNB for older adults undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures. The reported primary perceived advantages of using PNB in older adults with hip fractures included reduced pain and decreased opioid use within 72 h postoperatively. The reported primary difficulties in using PNB included surgical delays and institutional culture against PNB use. Most respondents (86%) supported further research on PNB outcomes to assess if benefits beyond acute pain exist.

conclusionThe majority of anesthesia clinicians surveyed perceived PNBs as potentially beneficial for pain management in hip fracture patients. However, numerous reported barriers to PNB use were identified. Given the convenience sampling approach, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and further research on PNB's association with patient-centered outcomes and implementation strategies may help address these obstacles.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsAttitude of Health PersonnelHip FracturesNerve BlockPain ManagementAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse AnesthetistsPeripheral NervesPostoperative PainSurveys and QuestionnairesAnesthesiaHip fracturePain managementPeripheral nerve blocks

Identifiers

PMID41709152
PMCPMC13020384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.