Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709147›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

Development and validation of an in-hospital cardiogenic shock prediction model for AMI patients based on machine learning.

Shuzhen Du, Wenqiang Li, Yubo Wang, Haixia Wang, Hong Kang, Yan Liang, Yanhua Lai, Li Ma, Jing Zhao, Zheng Zhang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuzhen Du *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Wenqiang Li *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yubo Wang *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Haixia WangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Hong KangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yan LiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yanhua LaiDepartment of Cardiology, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Hezuo, 747000, China. 495664279@qq.com.
Li MaDepartment of Cardiology, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Hezuo, 747000, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. zj_ccu@163.com.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. zhangccu@163.com.

Funding

the Clinical Cooperative Pilot Project of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Major Diseases (no. Administration of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2018], no. 3), National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2018YFC1311505), Gansu Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases (no. 18JR2FA005), Gansu Provincial Clinical Research Center (no. 18JR2FA005)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a prediction model for in-hospital cardiogenic shock (CS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsA total of 1608 AMI patients admitted to the First Hospital of Lanzhou University during 2023 and 2024 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The 851 patients from 2023 were randomly divided into a training set (n = 595) and a validation set (n = 256) at a ratio of 7:3. The LASSO–Boruta combined algorithm was used for feature selection, resulting in the construction of six ML models. The validation set was used for internal validation, while the patients enrolled from 2024 served as a temporal external validation cohort in a test set (n = 757). Model performance was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1 score. Additionally, SHAP analysis was employed to interpret the contribution of the selected features. An online prediction application based on the Streamlit framework was developed.

resultsLASSO regression initially identified 13 candidate features, while the random forest (RF) model demonstrated the best predictive performance in the training set. Following Boruta refinement, seven key features were retained, leading to the construction of an updated RF model. This model achieved an AUROC of 0.906, an accuracy of 0.977, a precision of 0.900, a sensitivity of 0.643, a specificity of 0.996, and a F1 score of 0.750 on the internal validation set. Temporal external validation at the same center showed an AUROC of 0.988, an accuracy of 0.967, a precision of 0.701, a sensitivity of 0.904, a specificity of 0.972, and a F1 score of 0.790. Furthermore, the model demonstrated excellent calibration, with a Brier score of 0.023 and 0.027. The SHAP analysis ranked feature importance as Killip class, D-dimer (DD), creatinine (Crea), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), apolipoprotein B/A (APOB/A), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and lactate (Lac).

conclusionWe developed and validated a RF model based on seven key variables—Killip class, DD, Crea, ALT, APOB/A, DBP and Lac—that serves as a predictive tool for identifying the risk of in-hospital CS in AMI patients post-PCI. Additionally, we created an online prediction application using Streamlit, which facilitates the implementation of this model into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesMachine LearningMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Learning ModelsShock, CardiogenicAgedChinaClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Value of TestsRandom ForestAcute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockMachine learningPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID41709147
PMCPMC13019760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.