ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Prevalence and risk factors for laparoscopic managed ectopic pregnancies at a tertiary referral hospital - a 10-year synopsis: a cross sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacological topics of interest for young people: misinformation on TikTok is common.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctopic pregnancies (EP) are a common pregnancy associated complication. They are associated with significant morbidity, and rarely mortality, if not managed properly. EP have a myriad of predisposing factors that help identify patients at risk and facilitate early diagnosis and intervention. We set out to conduct an audit of EP managed surgically at our hospital for a 10-year period and discern the incidence, prevalence and risk factors of their occurrence.
methodsThis study was designed as a Retrospective Clinical Audit based at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH). Study population was all women admitted to AKUH with a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy that was surgically managed between the period of January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2020. Analysis of data was done against a pre-set checklist. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables was calculated and tabulated in graphs and tables. SPSS version 22 was used for analysis of data.
resultsA total of 347 patient files were recruited in the study. The hospital-based incidence rate of surgically managed ectopic pregnancies was 1.78 per 100 live births between 2011 and 2020 as calculated against hospital delivery statistics in the period. There was a significant rise in surgically managed EP in the hospital per year with 26.6 cases/year prior to 2016 and 42.8 cases/year after 2016. 71.8% (n = 249) of the patients were below the age of 35 years while 28.2% (n = 98) were above the age of 35 years. 70.5% of women with an EP did not have any identifiable risk factors. 7.8% had previous tubal surgery for an EP. 7.5% of the participants had previous pelvic inflammatory disease or a positive Chlamydia Trachomatis infection. 6.6% of women mentioned current IUD use while 0.9% had antecedent EC use. 3.9% were on follow up for infertility or reported EPL and 2.4% had multiple factors. Only 0.3% of patients reported smoking.
conclusionThe present study outlines the higher incidence of surgically managed ectopic pregnancies in our population. Furthermore, we explored predisposing factors to EP which mostly mimic the pattern and occurrence in other populations. This study forms the index study in a series that looks at the pattern of surgically managed EP with the last study outlining the cost effectiveness of surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.