Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709094›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of sociology2026

Marriage, Wealth, and the Spread of Cohabitation in Canada.

Maude Pugliese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Marriage, Wealth, and the Spread of Cohabitation in Canada.The British journal of sociology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maude PuglieseInstitut National de La Recherche Scientifique, Québec, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-7433

Funding

Social Science Research Council of Canada 430-2019-01030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research demonstrates a robust link between marriage and wealth. Wealth facilitates marriage, which then fosters wealth accumulation, resulting in significant net worth disparities between married and cohabiting couples. Does the decline of marriage and growth of cohabitation alter this relationship? Previous research suggests variable outcomes across societies and groups. Wealth gaps may persist (or even widen) where cohabitation emerges primarily due to economic uncertainty or as a prolonged stage preceding marriage. However, gaps might narrow substantially where cohabitation diffuses as an alternative to marriage. Using Canada as a comparative case, this paper explores these dynamics. It contrasts the province of Québec, where cohabitation expanded largely as an alternative to marriage among French-speaking residents, with other provinces as well as Québec's anglophones, where cohabitation spread mostly as a preceding stage to marriage and due to economic insecurity. Leveraging data from Canada's Survey of Financial Security and the Longitudinal Administrative Databank, results indicate that marriage-cohabitation wealth gaps have narrowed substantially in French-speaking Québec since the 1990s compared to other provinces and Québec's English-speakers, in line with theoretical predictions. This change appears to hold for both men and women and to stem largely from weakened associations between wealth and marriage entry, alongside more modest reductions in the wealth gains of marriage among men in Québec. These results suggest that when marriage loses cultural centrality and is replaced by alternative union types, as it has in Québec, its link with wealth accumulation may weaken considerably.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsIncomeMarriageCanadaFamily StructureFemaleHumansMaleQuebecSocioeconomic Factorscohabitationinequalitymarriagewealth

Identifiers

PMID41709094
PMCPMC13536532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.