ArticleBehavior genetics2026
Expanding the Danish Twin Registry into its Third Century: Secular Trends in Twin Births and Survival.
Article in Behavior genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Danish Twin Registry has been expanded several times since its establishment in 1954. Here we describe the inclusion of the Danish 2001-2021 twin birth cohorts and the merging with the Danish 1870-2000 twin birth cohorts that enabled us to analyze changes in both twin birth frequency and survival over three centuries. Through Danish nationwide registers, 22,680 twin pairs born in Denmark in the period 2001-2021 were identified and contacted. Response to an electronic questionnaire including similarity questions for zygosity classification was obtained from 15,005 pairs (66.2%). Genetic markers for a subsample revealed a zygosity misclassification rate of 5.3%. From the mid-19th to the mid-20th century, twinning rate was relatively stable followed by an unexplained one third reduction from 1950 to 1970. A doubling occurred from the 1980s to the 2000s due to increasing maternal age at birth and, most importantly, Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR). Changes in MAR procedures have since resulted in a marked decline, bringing the contemporary twinning rate back to the level of the 19th century. In the 19th century, 43% of twins died before age 6; in the 1970s, the number was 5.4% and in the most recent 21st century cohorts, it was 2.0%. In all three centuries studied, the twin mortality before age 6 was 2-5 times higher in twins compared to singletons. However, large studies of the Danish and other Scandinavian twin cohorts suggest that twin-singleton differences generally vanish with age and, for more recent birth cohorts, are few and generally small after childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41709071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.