ArticleTransfusion2026
The impact of rapid infusers on the hemostatic potential of cryoprecipitate products.
Article in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of rapid infusers on the hemostatic potential of cryoprecipitate products.Transfusion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn cases of massive transfusion, intravenous access can be limited. Additionally, delivering different products through separate lines and infusion methods adds unnecessary steps. RBC, plasma, and whole blood (WB) are delivered via rapid infusers; cryoprecipitate (CRYO) is infused through separate access and is not approved with these devices. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe examined the impact of different transfusion methods on hemostatic performance and factor activity using two available CRYO products. Ten bags of CRYO, ten bags pathogen-reduced CRYO (Intercept® Fibrinogen Complex, IFC), and 20 units of WB were obtained. Each CRYO bag was infused with one unit of WB by three techniques: (1) gravity infusion with filter, (2) rapid infuser at 70 mL/min, and (3) pressure bag and filter. Hemostatic potential was measured by thrombelastography (TEG), thrombin generation (CAT), and factor levels (ACLTOP). Post-each infusion, disposable tubing and infusion parts were inspected for evidence of clumping or clogging.
resultsBoth standard CRYO and IFC demonstrated maintained or improved TEG, CAT, and factor levels when subjected to a rapid infuser device and pressure bag. When compared with gravity infusion, a rapid infuser device and pressure bag demonstrated maintained or improved values by TEG, CAT, and factor activity. No evidence of clumping or clogging of tubing was encountered in the 20 runs performed. No evidence of system dysfunction with use of CRYO through these devices was found either. DISCUSSION: Restriction of CRYO infusion through rapid infuser devices or with pressure bags should be reconsidered. Future clinical trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.