ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Generalist vs. specialist: cognition and behavioral flexibility in Gambusia across habitats.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying associations between ecological strategy and cognitive and behavioral traits is essential in predicting species sensitivity or persistence in the face of environmental change. Ecological generalists with a larger niche breadth are expected to exhibit high levels of behavioral flexibility, whereas specialists are likely to show increased performance of cognitive traits directly related to specific ecological challenges. To explore how ecological niche breadth is associated with cognitive and behavioral traits, we compared risk-taking, motivation, activity, and inhibitory control between two sister species of Gambusia that differ in ecological strategy: Gambusia affinis is an ecological generalist occupying a wide range of habitat types, and Gambusia geiseri is a specialist. Using a detour task and behavioral tracking, we evaluated cognitive and behavioral traits in both species from sympatric populations collected at two sites: one on the San Marcos River where G. geiseri dominates, and another on the Comal River characterized by more variable environmental conditions and roughly equal abundance of G. geiseri and G. affinis. We found that the generalist species, G. affinis was more likely to complete the detour task and was faster to exit a refuge indicating higher risk-taking behavior in this species. Gambusia geiseri from the variable habitat showed reduced solving success and slower solving speed which suggests that inhibitory control is associated with species identity and ecological niche breadth. Activity levels differed significantly across species and habitat type. We found a species by population interaction where G. affinis had a higher swimming velocity than G. geiseri in the Comal River, but a lower swimming velocity than G. geiseri in San Marcos River. Our findings highlight how cognitive and behavioral traits differ between generalist and specialist strategies and underscore these associations as drivers of species resilience to environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.