Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708921›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2026

Cost Considerations in Penile Implant Surgery from a Global Perspective.

Kristian Black, Leila Momtazi-Mar, Hannah Glick, Scott D Lundy, Raevti Bole, Petar Bajic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristian BlackGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA. Blackk20@ccf.org.
Leila Momtazi-MarGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.
Hannah GlickDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Scott D LundyGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.
Raevti BoleGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.
Petar BajicGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195-0001, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review evaluates global trends, economic considerations, and recent innovations in penile prosthesis surgery for erectile dysfunction (ED). It aims to examine rising procedural costs, disparities in accessibility, and strategies to enhance affordability particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). RECENT

findingsDespite its cost-effectiveness and high patient satisfaction, penile prosthesis surgery remains underutilized due to increasing costs and inconsistent insurance coverage. In the U.S., a shift toward ambulatory surgical centers may help reduce procedural costs. Low-cost devices like the Shah Malleable Prosthesis have improved accessibility in LMICs but face limited global adoption due to regulatory and evidence gaps. Broader health system reforms and novel tools such as predictive digital models may further mitigate economic barriers. Penile prosthesis implantation is a durable and effective treatment for ED but remains financially inaccessible to many patients worldwide. Reducing costs through outpatient surgery, insurance expansion, and validated low-cost devices can improve global access. Future progress requires coordinated policy reform and investment in scalable, equitable care pathways.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionHealth Care CostsPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleAmbulatory surgeryCost-effectivenessErectile dysfunctionGlobal health disparitiesInsurance coveragePenile prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41708921
PMCPMC12916983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.