ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
CVS assessment via distillation-based self-supervised and multiple instance learning in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate and automated assessment of the critical view of safety (CVS) is crucial for preventing bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Existing methods often rely on costly segmentation labels or sequential inputs, limiting generalization and spatiotemporal understanding. This study proposes an efficient framework that removes the need for segmentation annotations while enhancing model robustness and temporal-spatial comprehension.
methodsWe introduce SMIL framework, a novel framework for automated CVS assessment that combines distillation-based self-supervised pretraining and multiple instance learning. A video transformer is first pretrained using label-free self-distillation to capture rich spatiotemporal features. We conducted a benchmark evaluation on the public Endoscapes2023 dataset, comprising 201 LC videos whose CVS-relevant frames are released at 1 fps (58,813 frames in total). Training/validation/testing followed the official video-level split of 120/41/40 videos. It is then fine-tuned via MIL by fusing global and local representations for multi-label CVS classification.
resultsExperimental results on the official test partition show that SMIL framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods without relying on segmentation labels. Compared to the strongest label-free baseline, SMIL achieves gains of 3.21% in mean average precision and 2.74% in balanced accuracy, setting a new benchmark for automated CVS assessment without dense annotations. Notably, SMIL also surpasses segmentation-supervised models in mAP, further highlighting its efficient learning capability.
conclusionThe SMIL framework enables automated CVS assessment without segmentation annotations or sequential inputs. By combining self-supervised and multiple instance learning, it enhances spatiotemporal understanding and generalization in LC surgeries, offering both theoretical insights and practical value for surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41708890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.