ReviewThe EMBO journal2026
eIF3 musketeers: loyal in health, rogue in disease, and redeemed by therapeutic targeting.
Review in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is the largest and most complex initiation factor in eukaryotes, functioning as a central hub that integrates signals from cellular stress, metabolism, and developmental pathways to regulate mRNA translation. Recent advances have uncovered subunit-specific roles of eIF3 that extend beyond canonical cap-dependent translation to include specialized mechanisms such as selective mRNA recruitment, noncanonical cap recognition, and translation elongation. This review summarizes the current mechanistic understanding of the contribution of aberrant eIF3 activity to diverse disease processes, including oncogenesis, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, muscle pathology, and infectious disease. We evaluate therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating eIF3 function, including subunit-selective small molecules, RNA-based therapeutics, and CRISPR-based interventions. We discuss the therapeutic promise of both inhibitory approaches-targeting oncogenic or pathogen-hijacked eIF3-and restorative strategies to correct genetic loss-of-function in neurological disease. Finally, we outline key challenges and opportunities for clinical translation, including tissue-specific delivery, subunit selectivity, and the identification of predictive biomarkers. eIF3 emerges as a versatile and druggable node in translational control with broad relevance across human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.