ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
A conformational benchmark for optical property prediction with solvent-aware graph neural networks.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A conformational benchmark for optical property prediction with solvent-aware graph neural networks.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting optical spectra of molecules is essential for creating better OLED emitters, solar-cell dyes, and fluorescent probes. Traditional methods, such as time-dependent density-functional theory, are computationally expensive and often inaccurate. Current Graph Neural Network (GNN) approaches for optical properties prediction are faster and offer better performance. Still, they operate on 2D graphs and ignore the 3D geometrical features that control excited-state behavior. We present nablaColors-3D, a rigorously curated dataset for the prediction of optical properties consisting of 26369 chromophore-solvent pairs with three conformations optimized at different levels of quantum theory. Based on this dataset, we establish a scaffold-split benchmark for 3D GNNs and systematically quantify how the fidelity of geometry optimization affects accuracy. Furthermore, we propose a solvent-aware modification for pretrained SE(3)-invariant architectures. Our best model, built on UniMol+, achieves MAE of 15.97 nm on a held-out test set, improving the previous state of the art by more than 30%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.