ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigation on the cutting-infiltration integrated strategy based on medical waterjet for targeted drug delivery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of cutting and anesthesia within a single surgical instrument presents a significant opportunity to increase precision and reduce mechanical injury. This study introduces an innovative integrated water jet system that synergistically combines tissue dissection with localized drug delivery. A dedicated experimental platform was developed on the basis of hydrodynamic principles, enabling synchronous cutting and anesthesia. Systematic evaluations were conducted through cutting-diffusion experiments, tissue surface morphology analysis, and spatial diffusion tracking of anesthetics via photoacoustic imaging. The results demonstrated a nonlinear positive correlation between jet parameters (pressure and nozzle diameter) and both the cutting depth and diffusion distance. The optimal performance was achieved at distinct parameters for different tissue types: 4 MPa with a 0.2 mm nozzle for muscle tissue, and 8 MPa with a 0.2 mm nozzle for adipose tissue. Compared with conventional scalpel excision, the water jet technique significantly reduced tissue damage, as evidenced by a 51% reduction in fiber breakage and a 35% decrease in damaged area, while preserving up to 39.45 μm of functional structure. Furthermore, photoacoustic imaging revealed nonmonotonic diffusion dynamics of the anesthetic, with the maximum diffusion distance occurring adjacent to the cutting depth (18.31 ± 2 mm), confirming a “cutting-guided diffusion” mechanism. These findings establish a foundational framework for device-drug synergy in surgery, advancing the development of multifunctional, minimally invasive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.