ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of athlete performance based on a gradient regression model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of athlete performance is a challenges issue of significance in sports science and analytics and has application in training design, injury prevention, and talent management. Conventional statistical models usually cannot represent nonlinearities that are highly intricate in terms of physiological, lifestyle, and contextual characteristics. The main aim of the study is the prediction of performance (predictive validity/generalization) of the performance scores of the athletes based on the tabular data. An interpretability is a secondary objective that is tackled through SHAP-based explanations, and computational efficiency is considered as the practical aspect of the selected model class; deployment feasibility is only presented as a possible application, not as a proven real-world application. The main objective is to offer a dependable platform of determining the main determinants of athlete performance and data-driven decision making in sports coaching. Kaggle Athlete Performance Prediction Dataset was used, which included demographic, training, physiological, and/or lifestyle features. Imputation, normalization, encoding, and feature engineering then followed, and finally, partitioning into training, validation, and test sets. Gradient Regression Model was trained with tenfold cross-validation and compared against various baseline which included linear regression, Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest, and Neural Networks. Measures of evaluation wereR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.