ArticleScientific reports2026
Land use and land cover dynamics in dryland ecosystem of Northwestern Ethiopia: taking into account uncertainties and correcting bias in satellite-based maps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information on Land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics is crucial for environmental change studies. Remote sensing offers option for monitoring multitemporal LULC dynamics. However, remote sensing-based LULC maps include classification errors that may have effect on area estimates. A variety of area estimators have been developed to correct the errors despite they have not been fully utilized. The study investigated spatiotemporal LULC dynamics that account bias and uncertainty analysis in dry woodlands of Northwestern Ethiopia. Reference data were collected from Google Earth for classification and accuracy assessment. Then, a random forest model was used to produce LULC maps of 1986‒2019 with the overall accuracies ranged from 92.0 to 97.8%. A stratified estimator was used to estimate a bias-adjusted area with its uncertainty using reference data. The result indicated the bias-adjusted area estimates of LULC class had minor uncertainty ranged 0‒13.0%. Cropland substantially increased by 116.8%, while grassland and woodland decreased by 59.1 and 24.7%, respectively between 1986 and 2019. However, woodland and forest gained 21.4 and 24.0% between 2000 and 2010 and 2010 and 2019, respectively. There was insignificant difference between the mapped area and the corresponding bias-adjusted area estimates, with a relative error ranged from ‒6.7 to 4.3%. Despite these, errors in maps were somehow critical, accounting for significant variation in the estimations of some classes. The study highlighted the importance of reference data to produce robust estimates along with spatially explicit maps. Landscapes of the study area have experienced widespread LULC changes requiring strategy that properly manage woodland ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.