ArticleScientific reports2026
Standardized quantum transistor block enables differentiable learning on gait dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce the Quantum Transistor (QT), a standardized variational quantum building block inspired by the operating-point and gain semantics of classical transistors. The QT is specified as a two-qubit template (gate g, channel t), but the experiments reported here instantiate the non-entangling special case in which g is deterministically prepared in [Formula: see text] and is not reused; consequently, the controlled-[Formula: see text] bias reduces to an unconditional single-qubit [Formula: see text] on the channel qubit t. In this instantiation the QT implements an analytically tractable, bounded scalar nonlinearity [Formula: see text] with closed-form gain and saturation, and the full QT stack is efficiently classically simulable (a shallow classical contraction composed with bounded trigonometric scalar nonlinearities). We evaluate this standardized, single-qubit-effective QT stack on subject-aware gait classification with HyperBand and grouped cross-validation. In a locked-out 3-fold grouped protocol, the QT network reaches the mean test accuracy 0.960 and the mean F1 0.931. Strong classical baselines (CNN and Transformer encoders operating directly on the same spectrogram windows from which the QT’s 8-D inputs are derived) achieve F1 in the 0.962–0.964 range. Although the present QT stack (in its non-entangling, efficiently classically simulable instantiation) is outperformed by parameter-matched classical baselines, the objective of this paper is to validate a standardized, analyzable quantum-layer primitive rather than to claim superiority on this dataset. Accordingly, we position the evaluated system as a quantum-inspired, hybrid structured model study and we do not claim quantum advantage in this manuscript. The QT’s fixed port contract, closed-form gain/saturation, and constant-depth instruction template enable portable compilation, lightweight conformance tests (midpoint/slope/noise contraction), and predictable shot/latency budgeting. These properties are directly relevant in settings where a quantum co-processor is available as part of the system (e.g., integration with quantum sensing or other quantum-data pipelines). We therefore contextualize accuracy with strong classical baselines while outlining the block-level extensions (trainable biasing, pooling, richer encodings, and genuinely data-dependent gating) needed to close the remaining performance gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.