ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational modeling of seizure reconstruction and attenuation via model reference control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common and widely studied brain disorders in the world, but its precise triggering mechanisms are not yet fully understood. This has led to the development of mathematical models capable of describing seizures in order to study their generation, propagation, and control. Data-driven models and state-feedback controllers have been used together to artificially reconstruct and mitigate seizures, providing information that may help physicians better define the shape, frequency, and intensity of the input stimulus required for seizure attenuation. However, there are several constraints to their applicability, such as reliance on stationarity-dependent techniques, restriction to local field potentials (LFPs), and the assumption of hybrid controllers. The main goal of this article is to overcome these obstacles by adopting a new approach consisting of orthogonal functions, model reference controllers (MRCs), and adaptive gains or fixed gains, applied to electroencephalograms (EEG) and intracranial EEGs (iEEG). The results demonstrate the possibility of reconstructing seizures and achieving attenuation for both types of signals artificially, also parametrizing the level of expected attenuation based on the magnitude of input and adherence of the model to the real signature. Moreover, the concept of hybrid controllers can be further formalized, demonstrating both practical appeal and consistency with previous studies in the literature on real electrical stimulation therapies. At last, the parameters of both controllers can be tuned so that the magnitude of the stimulation input remains within 5 to 18 V, close to reference voltage levels (up to 14V) from the literature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.