ArticleScientific reports2026
Disturbance-tolerant quadrotor control using a hybrid LQR and super-twisting sliding mode approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a robust cascaded hybrid control architecture combining the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) with Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control (STSMC) to address the attitude stabilization problem of underactuated quadrotor UAVs. In this framework, the inner LQR loop ensures optimal stabilization, while the outer STSMC loops provide robust reference modification to compensate for uncertainties. To maximize the robustness of the proposed hybrid architecture, the parameters of the STSMC component were globally optimized using the Big Bang-Big Crunch (BB-BC) algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is rigorously evaluated on the Quanser 3-DOF Hover system model against two distinct benchmarks: the classical LQR and the optimization-based Model Predictive Control (MPC). Comprehensive simulation scenarios were conducted, including stochastic wind disturbances, time varying thrust coefficients, sudden payload release, and critical motor failure. Additionally, a virtual 3D spatial analysis based on kinematic reconstruction was performed to validate the positional stability of the rotor tips. The comparative results demonstrate that while the MPC controller exhibits a faster transient response compared to the classical LQR, it suffers from significant performance degradation under model mismatches. In contrast, the proposed LQR-STSMC consistently outperforms both benchmarks, achieving error metrics (ISE, IAE, and ITAE) orders of magnitude lower than the competitors. The findings confirm that the hybrid scheme offers superior fault tolerance, faster stabilization, and precise tracking capabilities, making it a highly reliable alternative for safety critical flight operations in uncertain environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.