ArticleScientific reports2026
Classification of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using sinus rhythm electrocardiograms using the symmetric projection attractor reconstruction method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered cardiac arrhythmia, increasing stroke risk and mortality. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) can be challenging to detect because arrhythmias occur intermittently. We have been able to classify PAF patients from sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECG), using a signal processing technique, Symmetric Projector Attractor Reconstruction, which transforms the ECG time-series into a quantifiable two-dimensional image termed an attractor. To optimise this methodology, we investigated the impact of varying parameters within the SPAR method, choice of lead, ECG sampling frequency and machine learning model choice. We determined that using a K nearest neighbours (KNN) model with 125 Hz ECG sampling frequency, using specific features that quantified the density of the attractor, gave a classification accuracy of 81.2%. When using a decision tree model it was found that the sensitivity was 72.5% which shows an obvious improvement over 30-day long term monitoring which has a sensitivity of 34%. The results of this paper present consideration for the application of a new method to the clinically relevant problem of aiding detection of PAF and conjectures as to the reasoning behind these results. Further investigation in larger cohorts is needed to fully elucidate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.