ArticleScientific reports2026
Elbow flexion enables rescuers with low BMI to deliver chest compressions in compliance with CPR guideline recommendations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Chest Compression Depth, Rate, and Spring Resistance with "Quality CardioPulmonary Resuscitation" (QCPR) Scores in a Manikin Model.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes. Smaller rescuers have been found to be at risk of providing inadequate CPR, particularly relating to chest compression depth, especially in novice rescuers. This study aims to look at the quality of CPR provided by smaller rescuers, and to investigate any potential compensation techniques used such as elbow flexion and extension, to maintain adequate quality CPR. Healthy adult participants performed three five-minute sequences of CPR on a mannequin with springs of 3 different strengths, in a randomized order. An electrogoniometer attached to the elbow measured the flexion and extension throughout. The results suggest that chest compressions were maintained at recommended depth and rate levels despite the increase in spring stiffness by using elbow flexion and extension, especially in participants with lower BMI and increased spring stiffness. These findings suggest potential compensatory mechanisms that can be used to maintain good CPR in situations of the rescuer being significantly smaller than the patient, similarly to as has been suggested when delivering CPR in hypogravity, thus transferring knowledge from these environments to Earth. Using elbow flexion and extension should be taken into consideration when revising the internationally recognized CPR guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.