Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain.

Sarah Raymond, Elizabeth A Chadwick, Sarah E Perkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah RaymondThe Sir Martin Evans Building, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. raymondsc@cardiff.ac.uk.
Elizabeth A ChadwickThe Sir Martin Evans Building, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK.
Sarah E PerkinsThe Sir Martin Evans Building, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/S007504/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roads cause indirect and direct effects for wildlife, including pollution, behavioural changes, wildlife mortality and habitat fragmentation. The ecological impacts of roads extend beyond their immediate vicinity, into 'road effect zones'. Beyond road effect zones, 'roadless areas' can offer refuges from the ecological effects of roads. In this study, we quantify the number and distribution of roadless patches in Great Britain, their ecological status and their overlap with protected areas. Road effect zones applied 100, 500 and 1,000 m on either side of the road network revealed a highly fragmented landscape with 93,561, 29,164 and 6,138 roadless patches, covering 76.6%, 36.0% and 20.6% of terrestrial land, respectively. Roadless areas were smallest, on average, in England and largest in Scotland. For all road effect zones, more than 70% of patches were smaller than 1 km

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAnimals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsEcosystemFoxesMustelidaeUnited KingdomFragmentationProtected areasRoadless areasWildlife-vehicle collisions

Identifiers

PMID41708673
PMCPMC12917188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.