ArticleScientific reports2026
Time series electrocardiography (ECG) data for early prediction of cardiac arrest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing modern healthcare by enabling more precise and predictive diagnostics. In cardiology, AI is playing a vital role by assisting medical practitioners in analyzing complex electrocardiography (ECG) patterns with greater accuracy. As cardiovascular diseases continue to be a leading cause of mortality globally, the early prediction of sudden cardiac arrest remains a significant clinical challenge. This study explores the application of both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques of time series ECG data for the early prediction of life-threatening cardiac events. The analysis confirms that deep learning models excel at detecting intricate patterns by automatically learning features directly from raw data, though they often demand large datasets and substantial computational resources. In contrast, traditional machine learning approaches are more computationally efficient and interpretable, making them a practical choice for resource-constrained environments. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of deep learning models, with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) achieving an accuracy of 99.89%. Among machine learning models, the Random Forest classifier performed best, achieving an accuracy of 99.06% and highlighting the reliability of ensemble learning methods. These findings demonstrate the significant potential of AI-based ECG analysis to improve early diagnosis and clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.