Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708665›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Time series electrocardiography (ECG) data for early prediction of cardiac arrest.

M Khurram Umair, Rabbia Waheed, Muhammad Faisal Abrar, Sikandar Ali, It Ee Lee, Salman Jan, Farah Shaheen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Khurram UmairUniversity of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5394-030X
Rabbia WaheedNational University of Sciences Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4988-7446
Muhammad Faisal AbrarDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Engineering University of Hail, Hail City, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-9900
Sikandar AliSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK. Sikandar.Ali@uws.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-8615
It Ee LeeFaculty of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, 63100, Malaysia. ielee@mmu.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-8859
Salman JanFaculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University-Bahrain, A'ali, 18211, Bahrain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-694X
Farah ShaheenCollege of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, 54001, Iraq.

Funding

This research work is supported by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) under the 2023 Translational Research Program for the Energy Sustainability Focus Area (Project ID: MMUE/240001), the 2024 ASEAN IVO (Project ID: 2024-02), and Multimedia University, Malaysia. Project ID: MMUE/240001), the 2024 ASEAN IVO (Project ID: 2024-02)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing modern healthcare by enabling more precise and predictive diagnostics. In cardiology, AI is playing a vital role by assisting medical practitioners in analyzing complex electrocardiography (ECG) patterns with greater accuracy. As cardiovascular diseases continue to be a leading cause of mortality globally, the early prediction of sudden cardiac arrest remains a significant clinical challenge. This study explores the application of both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques of time series ECG data for the early prediction of life-threatening cardiac events. The analysis confirms that deep learning models excel at detecting intricate patterns by automatically learning features directly from raw data, though they often demand large datasets and substantial computational resources. In contrast, traditional machine learning approaches are more computationally efficient and interpretable, making them a practical choice for resource-constrained environments. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of deep learning models, with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) achieving an accuracy of 99.89%. Among machine learning models, the Random Forest classifier performed best, achieving an accuracy of 99.06% and highlighting the reliability of ensemble learning methods. These findings demonstrate the significant potential of AI-based ECG analysis to improve early diagnosis and clinical decision making.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyHeart ArrestArtificial IntelligenceClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID41708665
PMCPMC13013979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.