ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-modal approach for recognizing fake news and influential nodes in spreading them using deep learning and network analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rumors may spread swiftly and cause a lot of harm on social media. Finding the main nodes that fuel rumor's spread is necessary to lessen their impact. This study proposes a new technique that combines deep learning with graph-based clustering techniques to effectively detect rumor sources and predict the paths of spread in social networks. "Detection of rumors" and "Identifying the influential nodes in the spread of rumors" are the two primary steps of the algorithm that is being described. A criterion based on the rate of rumors spreading is used in the first phase of the suggested method to determine the significance of each connection in the social network graph. The characteristics of the contents are then described using the GloVe technique. After this stage, rumors are separated from other content using a deep neural network. In the second phase of the suggested approach, communities inside the social network structure are found using a novel clustering methodology, and each user's significance in spreading rumors is determined. The accuracy, precision, and processing time criteria have been used to assess the suggested method's effectiveness in determining the routes taken by rumors as they spread. In the trials, real social network databases were employed. The obtained findings demonstrate that the suggested method may effectively identify the path taken by rumors as they travel through social networks. The results of the case study also showed that the proposed method could recognize target data by average accuracy of 99% and achieve the precision of 0.99 in recognizing influential nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.