ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026
SwarmMAP: swarm learning for decentralized cell type annotation in single cell sequencing data.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design specifications for biomedical virtual twins in engineered adoptive cellular immunotherapies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid technological progress now enables large-scale generation of single-cell data. Many laboratories can produce single-cell transcriptomic profiles from diverse tissues. A key step in single-cell analysis is unsupervised clustering followed by cell-type annotation, yet there is no agreement on marker genes, and annotation is typically done manually, making it irreproducible and poorly scalable. Privacy constraints in human datasets further complicate data sharing. There is a need for standardized, automated, and privacy-preserving cell-type annotation across datasets. We developed SwarmMAP, which applies Swarm Learning to train machine-learning models for cell-type classification in a decentralized setting without exchanging raw data between centers. SwarmMAP achieves F1-scores of 0.93, 0.98, and 0.88 in heart, lung, and breast datasets, respectively. Swarm Learning models reach an average performance of 0.907, comparable to models trained on centralized data (p-val = 0.937, Mann-Whitney U Test). Increasing the number of datasets improves prediction accuracy and supports classification across broader cell-type diversity. These results show that Swarm Learning provides an effective approach for automated cell-type annotation. SwarmMAP is available at https://github.com/hayatlab/SwarmMAP .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.