ArticleNature communications2026
Extending the range of graph neural networks with global encodings.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical geometric deep learning enables scalable analysis of molecular dynamics.The Journal of chemical physics · 2026Article
- A unified machine-learning framework for ab initio multiscale modeling of liquids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Extending the range of graph neural networks with global encodings.Nature communications · 2026Article
- chemtrain-deploy: A Parallel and Scalable Framework for Machine Learning Potentials in Million-Atom MD Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are routinely used in molecular physics, social sciences, and economics to model many-body interactions in graph-like systems. However, GNNs are inherently local and can suffer from information flow bottlenecks. This is particularly problematic when modeling large molecular systems, where dispersion forces and local electric field variations drive collective structural changes. We introduce RANGE, a model-agnostic framework that employs an attention-based aggregation-broadcast mechanism that significantly reduces oversquashing effects, and achieves remarkable accuracy in capturing long-range interactions with linear scaling. Notably, RANGE integrates attention with positional encodings and regularization to dynamically expand virtual representations in virtual-node message-passing implementations. Across multiple state-of-the-art baselines, RANGE consistently restores long-range information, enabling the models to correctly predict electrostatic and dispersion-driven behavior even in out-of-distribution extrapolation tasks, where other unmodified baselines fail. Compared with other long-range paradigms, RANGE achieves the highest accuracy while requiring significantly less computational overhead, and it enables stable and scalable molecular dynamic simulations. RANGE offers accurate and efficient modeling of long-range interactions for simulating large molecular systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.