Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708567›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2026

Plasmonic sensors for dengue virus detection: technological advances, challenges, future directions.

Tanwin Mohammad Salauddin Ashrafi, Goutam Mohanty

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanwin Mohammad Salauddin AshrafiDepartment of Physics, G.M. Momin Women's College, University of Mumbai, Maharashtra, 421302, India.
Goutam MohantyDepartment of Physics, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, 144411, India. goutam.23352@lpu.co.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major health concerns is the dengue virus, due to the steadily rising number of reported cases worldwide. Conventional diagnostic techniques, such as the NS1 antigen test, IgM detection, ELISA, and PCR have several limitations, including restricted sensitivity, cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses, and challenges in distinguishing between primary and secondary infections. While ELISA and PCR often require longer processing time, NS1 tests are valued for their speed but may show reduced sensitivity after one week. In contrast, plasmonic-based sensors offer advanced capabilities like label-free detection, real-time monitoring, and rapid on-site diagnosis. In recent decades, plasmonic research, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR), localized SPR and fiber optic SPR, has advanced considerably for dengue detection. This breakthrough offers a significant improvement in sensitivity, specificity, and miniaturization, making it suitable for practical deployment. This review explores dengue outbreaks, fundamentals of plasmonic sensors with their sensing mechanism, recent innovations, challenges, commercialization and future perspectives, aiming to bridge the gap between laboratory research and real-world applications.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDengueDengue VirusSurface Plasmon ResonanceHumansChallenges and future directionsCommercial SPR systemDengue virus detectionIntegration of advanced materialsSPR-based biosensors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.