Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708554›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

A confound-free method to manipulate pupil size in psychological experiments.

Joshua Snell, Luise Wagner, Ana Vilotijević

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua SnellDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J.J.Snell@VU.nl.
Luise WagnerDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ana VilotijevićDepartment of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council ERC101164084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly showing interest in the ways in which various cognitive processes are influenced by the size of the pupil. However, this realm of research is complicated by the pupil's notorious susceptibility to confounders and difficulties in disentangling cause and effect. Recent studies have sought a solution in the exploitation of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which trigger pupil constrictions upon detecting blue light. The crux of the method is that stimuli are presented against blue versus red backgrounds of equal perceived luminance, to effectuate systematically smaller pupils in the former compared with the latter condition. Here we provide a further validation of this method, by testing a scenario of potential concern. Via retino-hypothalamic pathways, ipRGC activation modulates alertness and arousal. Blue and red backgrounds may therefore differentially impact behavior in addition to the pupil, potentially confounding inferences about the pupil's impact on cognition. This was investigated with an auditory task in which participants responded as quickly as possible to sequences of randomly timed beeps while looking at blue versus red displays. Each participant was tested with an easy and a difficult version of the auditory task. Results suggest that the ipRGC method is "good to go": in the presence of effects of task difficulty on both pupil size and task performance, the display color exclusively influenced pupil size without affecting task performance.

Indexed as

ArousalPupilRetinal Ganglion CellsAdultBlue LightFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultArousalEffortIpRGCPupillometryPupil size

Identifiers

PMID41708554
PMCPMC12916518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.