ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Tissue Strain Mapping via Magnetic Resonance Elastography Can Be Used to Detect Active Lesion Expansion.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeActive lesion expansion is clinically important because it can indicate disease progression and influence management and treatment planning. However, sequential imaging is often unavailable, and rapid growth can only be inferred from indirect findings such as active perilesional tissue injury. This study aimed to implement and test the feasibility of an MR elastography (MRE)-based technique for assessing the expansile nature of mass lesions by detecting stiffness changes caused by mechanical strain manifestations in adjacent tissues.
methodsA tissue strain mapping (TSM) algorithm was developed using spatial-temporal directional filtering to reveal the presence of perilesional latent strain that is not apparent in conventional MRE inversions. The technical feasibility was tested in tissue-simulating phantoms containing a mass that was progressively expanded. Preliminary feasibility for clinical application was also demonstrated in representative in vivo examples. Resulting TSM maps were compared with conventional MRE stiffness maps.
resultsIn the phantom experiments, TSM revealed the presence of local strain at the periphery of the expanding mass, with the effect increasing proportionally to the degree of expansion. Conventional MRE did not demonstrate comparable localized stiffening patterns. In vivo examples showed similar perilesional strain features that were not apparent on conventional MRE maps.
conclusionThe feasibility of the proposed MRE-based TSM technique was demonstrated in phantom and preliminary in vivo studies. These findings suggest that the technique is a promising tool for assessing the expansile nature of mass lesions and motivate further development of the TSM processing and exploration of potential clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.