Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708334›Full record

ArticleGenome research2026

Robust and efficient annotation of cell states through gene signature scoring.

Laure Ciernik, Agnieszka Kraft, Florian Barkmann, Josephine Yates, Valentina Boeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laure Ciernik *ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0005-4501-243X
Agnieszka Kraft *ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7672-2032
Florian BarkmannETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Josephine YatesETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Valentina BoevaETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Institute for Machine Learning, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland; valentina.boeva@inf.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4382-7185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene signature scoring is integral to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis, particularly for unsupervised cellular state annotation based on maximum signature score values. However, this application requires robust and comparable score distributions across diverse signatures and experimental conditions. Our systematic evaluation of established scoring methodologies-Seurat, SCANPY, UCell, and JASMINE-across nine healthy and cancer scRNA-seq data sets demonstrates their insufficiency in fulfilling this requirement. To address this limitation, we present Adjusted Neighborhood Scoring (ANS), a deterministic algorithm with enhanced control gene selection that significantly improves score stability and cross-signature comparability, achieving cell-state annotation accuracy comparable to supervised methods. We demonstrate the practical utility of ANS by developing and validating a gene signature to differentiate cancer-associated fibroblasts from malignant cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Overall, ANS provides a robust and reliable gene signature scoring framework, significantly improving the accuracy of score-based annotation of cell types and states in single-cell studies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence AnnotationSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAlgorithmsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41708334
PMCPMC12951948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.