Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708137›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2026

The decline of child stunting in 122 countries: a systematic review of child growth studies since the 19th century.

Eric B Schneider, Juliana Jaramillo Echeverri, Matthew Purcell, Brian A'Hearn, Vellore Arthi, Matthias Blum, Elizabeth Brainerd, Joseph Capuno, Alexandra Lopez Cermeño, Amílcar Challú and 33 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors.

Eric B SchneiderEconomic History Department, The London School of Economics and Political Science School of Public Policy, London, UK e.b.schneider@lse.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-0126
Juliana Jaramillo EcheverriBank of the Republic of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Matthew PurcellEconomic History Department, The London School of Economics and Political Science School of Public Policy, London, UK.
Brian A'HearnUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Vellore ArthiUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Matthias BlumGerman Medical Association, Berlin, Germany.
Elizabeth BrainerdBrandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph CapunoUniversity of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Alexandra Lopez CermeñoLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Amílcar ChallúBowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.
Young-Jun ChoSeoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Tim ColePopulation, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-8200
Jose CorpuzUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ewout DepauwGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Federico DrollerUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Dieter von FintelEconomics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6771-1315
Joël FlorisUniversity of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gregori Galofré-VilàUniversitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Bernard HarrisUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Tim HattonUniversity of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Laurent HeybergerUniversité de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard, Belfort, France.
Tuuli HurmeHelsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, Finland.
Kris InwoodUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Hanaliis JaadlaUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jan KokRadboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michał KopczynśkiUniwersytet Warszawski, Warsaw, Poland.
Samuel LordemusUniversitat Luzern, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Brian MareinWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Adolfo Meisel-RocaUniversidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Stephen MorganUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-9339
Stefan ÖbergLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kota OgasawaraTokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Japan.
José Antonio OrtegaUniversidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Nuno PalmaThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anastasios PapadimitriouEthniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistemio Athenon, Athens, Greece.
Renato PistolaUniversidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Björn QuanjerRadboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helena RotherInternational Trademark Association, New York City, New York, USA.
Sakari SaaritsaHelsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, Finland.
Ricardo SalvatoreUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Kaspar StaubUniversity of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Pierre van der EngAustralian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Evan RobertsUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChild stunting, a measure of malnutrition, is a major global health challenge affecting 148.1 million children in 2022. Global stunting rates have declined from 47.2% in 1985 to 22.3% in 2022; however, trends before the mid-1980s are unclear, including whether child stunting was previously prevalent in current high-income countries (HICs). We conducted a systematic review of child growth studies before 1990 to reconstruct historical rates of child stunting.

methodsWe included reports of mean height by age and sex for children up to age 10.99 years. We excluded studies that were not representative of the targeted population and data for children under age 2. Stunting rates were computed by converting the means and SDs of height to height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) using the WHO standard/reference, combining the HAZ distributions for all ages and measuring the share of the combined distribution below the stunting threshold.

resultsWe found 923 child growth studies at the community, regional and national level covering 122 countries from 1814 to 2016. We supplemented these historical studies with stunting estimates from the 1990s onward from the Joint Malnutrition Estimates database. Many current HICs had high levels of child stunting in the early 20th century, similar to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) today. However, there was heterogeneity: stunting rates were low in Scandinavia, the European settler colonies and in the Caribbean, higher in Western Europe and exceptionally high in Japan and South Korea. Child stunting declined across the 20th century.

conclusionThe global child stunting rate was substantially higher in the early 20th century than in 1985, and the reduction of child stunting was a central feature of the health transition. The high stunting rates and subsequent reduction of stunting in HICs suggest that current HICs provide lessons for eradicating child stunting and that all LMICs can eliminate stunting.

Indexed as

Global HealthGrowth DisordersChildChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesFemaleHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansInfantMalePrevalenceChild healthMedical demographyNutritionPublic HealthStunting

Identifiers

PMID41708137
PMCPMC12918666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.