ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Improving social needs screening in general paediatrics through project SEEK.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmet social needs in paediatric patients contribute to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. In order to identify unmet social needs, we aimed to improve social determinant of health (SDoH) screening of children admitted to the general paediatrics teams at our institution. Between September 2021 and September 2024, we conducted a quality improvement project by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team to improve identification of unmet social needs at our institution. We set two aims: (1) develop a screening process acceptable to families and (2) increase the percentage of children admitted to general paediatrics with SDoH screening documented across four domains, including food insecurity, transportation barriers, housing insecurity and financial strain from 0% to 60%. During the project period, 4229 patients were eligible for screening. Screening was found to be acceptable by a pilot group of patients and their families (n=22). Rates of screening improved from 0% to 56.7% after various interventions, including nursing education and feedback, providing meal trays from the cafeteria to families in need, and integration of the screening questionnaire into the electronic health record. Food insecurity screening positively correlated with SDoH screening across all four domains. This multidisciplinary quality improvement project implemented SDoH screening on general paediatrics which was found acceptable by patients, and rates of screening improved by addressing identified needs. Tangible resources, such as providing meal trays during the hospitalisation, were a unique aspect of this project that helped families and alleviated distress of the screeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.