Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708121›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026

Scoping out sarcoidosis: the evolving role of bronchoscopy.

Prince Ntiamoah, Felix Wireko, Ajay Wagh, Raul Mendoza-Ayala, Francisco Almeida, Joseph Cicenia, Manuel L Ribeiro Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prince NtiamoahInterventional Pulmonology, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Green Bay, WI, USA.
Felix WirekoPulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9731-3481
Ajay WaghInterventional Pulmonology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Raul Mendoza-AyalaInterventional Pulmonology, Aurora BayCare Medical Center, Green Bay, WI, USA.
Francisco AlmeidaInterventional Pulmonology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joseph CiceniaInterventional Pulmonology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Manuel L Ribeiro NetoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA ribeirm@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bronchoscopic approach to diagnosing sarcoidosis has evolved significantly with the advent of advanced endoscopic and imaging-guided modalities. Bronchoscopy remains the cornerstone for both histological confirmation and therapeutic intervention, offering minimally invasive access to the mediastinum, lung parenchyma and airways. This review integrates traditional techniques, including bronchoalveolar lavage, endobronchial biopsy and transbronchial biopsy, with advanced modalities such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy and mediastinal cryobiopsy. Emerging tools, including elastography and confocal laser endomicroscopy, are also explored for their potential to enhance diagnostic precision. A stage-based diagnostic algorithm is proposed to guide procedural choices tailored to clinical presentation. The role of bronchoscopy in diagnosing stage 0 and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is discussed. This comprehensive update synthesises recent evidence to provide a practical framework for clinicians navigating complex diagnostic scenarios in sarcoidosis.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyLungSarcoidosis, PulmonaryHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41708121
PMCPMC12914379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.