ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2026
Mediators of the relationship between precarious employment and mental health.
Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecarious employment is associated with poor mental health among workers. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood.
aimsTo investigate whether skill use and discretion, social environment, work intensity and working time quality mediate the relationship between precarious employment and mental well-being.
methodsUsing the Sixth European Working Conditions Survey, data across 35 countries were analysed. We conducted causal mediation analyses to decompose the association between the precarious employment index and mental well-being (measured using the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index [WHO-5]) into natural direct and indirect effects through four potential mediators, namely skill use and discretion, social environment, work intensity and working time quality. We additionally fitted a parallel multiple-mediator structural equation model as a robustness check.
resultsData from 31 903 employees were analysed. The total effect of the precarious employment index on WHO-5 scores was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The natural indirect effects were statistically significant through skill use and discretion index (34% mediated; 95% confidence interval, 28-40%) and social environment index (53% mediated; 95% confidence interval, 45-60%). Indirect effects through work intensity and working time quality were not statistically significant (both P > 0.05). The structural equation model showed the same pattern.
conclusionsPrecarious employment negatively impacts skill use and discretion as well as social environment, which significantly mediate its effect on mental well-being. Interventions targeting these mediators may help mitigate the adverse effects of precarious employment on workers' mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.