ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
Functional network organization is locally atypical in children, adolescents, and young adults with congenital heart disease.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shared and Specific Patterns of Brain Functional Network Abnormalities in Patients With Idiopathic Dystonia and Across Subtypes.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children, adolescents, and young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) frequently experience disruptions in neurodevelopment affecting their executive functioning and other cognitive abilities, which in turn can impact academic performance, psychosocial adjustment, and overall quality of life. This exploratory study aims to investigate the impact of CHD on functional brain network connectivity and cognitive function, with a particular focus on executive functioning. Rather than relying on a single network construction method or arbitrary thresholds, our study methodically employed both weighted networks and binarized networks generated using absolute and proportional thresholding. This cross-method approach enables us to identify functional connectivity features that persist across heuristically and arbitrarily defined parameters, and to evaluate their association with neurocognition. Using resting-state fMRI data, we examined several network metrics across brain regions using three network construction types: weighted networks, absolute-threshold binarized networks, and proportional-threshold binarized networks. Regression models were then fit to neuropsychological test scores using metrics obtained from each network construction approach. Our results identified differences in network connectivity with a predilection for temporal, occipital, and subcortical regions, across both weighted and binarized networks. Furthermore, we identified distinct correlations between network metrics and cognitive performance, suggesting potential compensatory mechanisms within specific brain regions. These results provide an initial, methodologically transparent characterization of altered network organization in CHD and offer directions for future hypothesis-driven investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.