ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Validation of the GALAD model for diagnosing HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe GALAD model integrates serological biomarkers (AFP, AFP-L3%, DCP) with demographic factors to estimate the presence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). However, its applicability in Chinese populations with HBV-related HCC remains underexplored. This study validated the clinical utility of GALAD in this specific population.
methodsA retrospective cohort study enrolled 217 HBV-related HCC patients, 210 patients with benign Liver disease without cirrhosis, 247 Cirrhosis patients, and 220 healthy controls. Serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP were measured. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed diagnostic performance, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test evaluated model calibration. Serum levels of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP were measured. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed diagnostic performance, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test evaluated model calibration.
resultsGALAD demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.942. At an optimal cutoff of 1.89, sensitivity and specificity were 89.91 % and 81.51 %, respectively. The model showed excellent calibration (χ
conclusionThe GALAD model outperforms individual biomarkers in diagnosing HBV-related HCC in the Chinese population, highlighting its potential utility in clinical practice. This cost-effective tool holds particular promise for the tertiary prevention of HBV-related HCC, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.