Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41707099›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2026

Development and Assessment of a Pipeline for Extracting Structured Data From Free-Text Medical Reports Using a Large Language Model.

Enzo Joseph, Paul Vallee, Tanguy Perennec, Nicolas Wagneur, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Mario Campone, François Bocquet, Florent Le Borgne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enzo JosephData Factory & Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0009-0008-3339-6191
Paul ValleeData Factory & Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.
Tanguy PerennecDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-2271
Nicolas WagneurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6666-0210
Jean-Sébastien FrenelOncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-0561
Mario CamponeOncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.
François BocquetData Factory & Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0009-0009-6247-1506
Florent Le BorgneData Factory & Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-1608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical free texts such as pathology reports contain valuable clinical data but are challenging to structure at scale. Traditional natural language processing approaches require extensive annotated data and training. We investigate the use of large language model (LLM) like Mistral to automatically extract three breast cancer (BC) biomarkers from pathology reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed and evaluated a pipeline combining Mistral Large LLM and a postprocessing phase. The pipeline's performance was assessed both at document and patient levels. For evaluation, two data sets were used: a data set of 1,152 pathology reports associated with 150 patients with BC focused solely on biomarker values and a gold standard database containing 101 patients with metastatic BC, enriched with detailed patient and tumor characteristics and double-blind validated by clinical research assistants. We also explored the pipeline's performance according to the use of a confidence prompt (CP), a chain of thought (CoT), and few-shot examples.

resultsOur extraction pipeline achieved F1 scores of more than 95% and both recall and precision of more than 94% for each biomarker of interest (ie, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and score) at the document level. At the patient level, the F1 score decreased between 87% and 90% with a greater drop in recall (ranging between 83% and 87%) compared with precision, which remained >90%. The results were similar whether the pipeline included a CP, CoT, or few-shot examples.

conclusionOur study provides strong evidence of the potential of LLMs like Mistral Large for extracting structured BC biomarker data from pathology reports and the potential of such methods for broader digital transformation of health care documents.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsData MiningNatural Language ProcessingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41707099
PMCPMC12928813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.