ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Risk Factors for Children's Vocabulary Performance: Background Variables and Parental Concerns.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to examine differences in vocabulary performance among Arabic-speaking children ages 1;6-3;6, using a three-domain theoretical framework (biological/genetic, developmental, and social/environmental factors), with particular focus on how these factors differ based on the presence of parental concerns.
methodData were collected from 874 parents of Palestinian Arabic-speaking children aged 18-36 months using the online Palestinian Arabic Communicative Development Inventory (PA-CDI). An accompanying background questionnaire was used to gather information on five potential risk factors.
resultsChildren with parental concerns demonstrated significantly lower vocabulary performance across all age groups. The proportion of concerned parents decreased as vocabulary percentile increased. All five examined risk factors correlated significantly with vocabulary performance. Parental concerns emerged as the strongest predictor overall. For children without parental concerns, onset of speaking was the only significant predictor, while for children with concerns, word combination abilities were the sole significant predictor.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the validity of parental concerns as indicators of potential language difficulties and underscore the importance of early language milestones in predicting vocabulary performance. Word combination abilities, in particular, seem valuable for identifying children with persistent language difficulties. The PA-CDI, combined with background variables, shows promise as an effective clinical tool for early identification of children at risk for language delays in Arabic-speaking populations. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Research has consistently demonstrated the validity and importance of parental concerns in identifying children's developmental issues, particularly in the early detection of DLD. Previous studies have established that parental observations can be as reliable as quality developmental screening tests. Early language milestones, including onset of speaking and word combinations, have been identified as significant predictors of vocabulary development. Risk factors for language development have been categorised into three domains: biological/genetic factors (family history, health conditions), developmental indicators (delayed milestones), and social/environmental factors. The CDI has emerged as a valuable tool for assessing vocabulary development and identifying children at risk for DLD across various languages. What this study adds to existing knowledge This study reveals that parental concerns emerge as the strongest predictor of vocabulary performance in Arabic, an understudied language in this context, accounting for 27.2% of variance in language development. For the first time, we demonstrate differential predictive patterns between children with and without parental concerns: Onset of speaking predicts performance for children without concerns, while word combination abilities serve as the sole significant predictor for children with concerns. The study validates a three-domain framework in Arabic-speaking populations and shows that subjective factors demonstrate significantly stronger relationships with vocabulary performance than objective indicators, challenging traditional assumptions about measurement reliability. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? These findings highlight the value of considering parental perspectives alongside standardised assessments to gain a comprehensive understanding of children's linguistic abilities in Arabic-speaking populations. Healthcare professionals should recognise that parental reports, when systematically collected, may provide more sensitive indicators of language development than traditional objective measures. Clinical assessment protocols should be restructured to give greater weight to structured parental observations. Word combination abilities, in particular, seem valuable for identifying children with persistent language difficulties. The PA-CDI, combined with background variables, shows promise as an effective clinical tool for early identification of children at risk for language delays in Arabic-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.