ArticlePloS one2026
Precise tea leaf disease detection using UAV low-altitude remote sensing and optimized YOLO11 model.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From classical practices to precision agriculture: a multidisciplinary review of tea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- A lightweight attention-enhanced framework for crop pest and disease detection in desert greenhouses.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A curated dataset and lightweight deep learning framework for tea leaf disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- From architectural complexity to minimalist optimization: refining microscopic tea disease detection via Opti-YOLOv11n.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tea leaf diseases seriously affect its yield and quality, and consequently there is an urgent need for intelligent detection methods with high precision and edge deployment capabilities. To address low detection accuracy in complex backgrounds, overfitting due to limited data, and redundant parameters for existing methods, this paper proposes an improved lightweight detection model FCHE-YOLO based on the YOLO11, which aims to achieve rapid and accurate identification of tea leaf disease combining low altitude remote sensing with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The model has made three key optimizations in the structure: Introduce the self-developed lightweight backbone module FC_C3K2, which significantly reduces computation and parameter count while enhancing the robustness of the model to complex scenarios; construct an efficient feature fusion structure HSFPN, optimizing multi-scale information integration and compressing model volume; design the detection head Efficient Head, integrating group convolution and lightweight attention mechanism to improve detection accuracy and suppress overfitting. The experimental results from the self built tea gardens show that the FCHE-YOLO improves the average accuracy (mAP) from 94.1% to 98.1% compared to the benchmark model YOLO11, with an improvement of 4.0 percentage points. Meanwhile, the inference speed of the model increases from 43.3 FPS to 47.5 FPS, with an increase of 9.0%, meeting the real-time detection requirements. More importantly, by network structure optimization, the model's computational complexity is significantly reduced: The floating-point operations per second (FLOPs) decreases from 6.4 G to 4.2 G, with a decrease of 34.3%, and the parameter count decreases from 2.59 M to 1.46 M, with the compression rate reaching 38.9%, which makes the model more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained UAV edge devices. The final test show that the FCHE-YOLO significantly reduces the missed-detection rate, owns better detection accuracy and deployment practicality, and is suitable for real-time monitoring scenarios of tea leaf diseases with UAVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.