Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706739›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sexual dimorphism in the cell number of the adult Drosophila brain.

Narendra Pratap Singh, Susan T Harbison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narendra Pratap SinghNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Susan T HarbisonNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7233-0947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual dimorphism in animal behavior is common and may originate from differences in brain structure or function. In Drosophila, substantial male and female specific differences in gross brain anatomy, neuronal wiring, and behavior have been observed. However, it is not known whether global differences in the brain anatomy are strictly due to differences in neuronal patterning or if differences in cell number may also play a role. PRINCIPAL

findingsDuring optimization of the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) to analyze gene regulation in adult brain cells we observed a need for more brain tissue in males compared to females. This suggested that male brains might have fewer cells. To test this hypothesis, we isolated total nuclei from adult brains and counted them using a flow cytometer. We found that female fly brains have approximately 30% more cells than male brains. These differences in cell number also correlated with differences in the physical size of the brain.

conclusionsOur results suggest that male and female brains are not only differently wired but also have global differences in cell number that should be considered when analyzing differences in their behavior.

Indexed as

BrainDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCell CountFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID41706739
PMCPMC12915905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.