ArticlePloS one2026
The influence of visual input and attention on gait initiation in people with Parkinson disease.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGait initiation relies on the integration of postural control, sensory input, and attention. All three components are impaired in Parkinson disease, which may contribute to characteristic gait initiation deficits, including shorter, slower first steps and smaller anticipatory postural adjustments. Understanding how sensory and attentional demands influence gait initiation could inform interventions that target underlying mechanisms rather than focusing solely on managing symptoms. This study examined the roles of vision and attention on gait initiation in people with Parkinson disease compared to older adult controls. We hypothesized that altering visual input and attentional demands would worsen gait initiation in both groups, with stronger effects in people with Parkinson disease. We also expected an interaction between visual input and attentional demands for people with Parkinson disease, further exacerbating impairment.
methodsSixteen people with Parkinson disease (Hoehn & Yahr stages I-III, on medication), and 16 older adults (aged 55+) initiated gait under four visual conditions: unaltered input, partial occlusion, full occlusion, and additional visual stimuli, each performed with and without a cognitive dual task. We measured first step length, first step speed, and anticipatory postural adjustment size to compare between groups and conditions.
resultsNo interaction effects between group and condition were observed (all p ≥ 0.159). Full visual occlusion resulted in reduced first step length, first step speed, and anteroposterior anticipatory postural adjustment size (p ≤ 0.006). Partial occlusion resulted in decreased first step length and increased mediolateral anticipatory postural adjustment size (p ≤ 0.049). Gait initiation under a cognitive-motor dual task condition resulted in decrements across all variables (p ≤ 0.007).
conclusionsReduced visual input and increased attentional demands impair gait initiation in older adults and people with Parkinson disease. These findings highlight the roles of visual input and attention during gait initiation, but suggest visuo-attentional deficits may not uniquely contribute to hypokinesia in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.