Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706705›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2026

Genetic underpinnings of chills from art and music.

Giacomo Bignardi, Danielle Admiraal, Else Eising, Simon E Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giacomo BignardiLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-0684
Danielle AdmiraalLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Else EisingLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-1260
Simon E FisherLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-1996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Art can evoke strong emotional responses in humans. Here, we examine genetic contributions to chills, a marker of such responses. We gather self-reports from a genotyped sample of thousands of partly related individuals from the Netherlands (n = 15,606). Using genomic relationships based on common single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, we find that up to 29% of the variation in proneness to aesthetic (visual art and poetry) and music chills can be explained by familial relatedness effects, one-fourth of which is attributed to SNP variation. Furthermore, we reveal a moderate genetic correlation of .58 between aesthetic and music chills, pointing to shared genetic variation affecting susceptibility to strong emotional responses across different art forms. Finally, we find that a polygenic index (PGI) for openness to experience (n = 220,015) is associated with susceptibilities to both aesthetic and music chills. Our results show that additive genetic variation, but also familial relatedness beyond shared common SNPs, contributes to proneness to chills from artistic, poetic, and musical expressions. These results open up a promising path towards studying the human attitude towards art, via both state-of-the-art genomics and intergenerational models of transmission.

Indexed as

ArtEmotionsMusicFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMultifactorial InheritanceNetherlandsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID41706705
PMCPMC12915973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.