ArticlePloS one2026
Environmental drivers of wild orchid distribution: Soil properties shape habitat preferences in the Po Delta Regional Park (Italy).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
European terrestrial orchids inhabit a wide range of habitats, including forests, grasslands, wetlands and anthropogenic ecosystems. This study investigates the ecological preferences of seven wild orchid species in the Po Delta Regional Park (Northern Italy), focusing on how environmental gradients of soil properties such as moisture, salinity, pH, and nutrient availability shape species distribution and niche breadth. We conducted vegetation surveys and field measurements of soil variables across 27 sites. Species differentiation along environmental gradients was analysed through Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Outlying Mean Index (OMI) analysis to assess niche breadth and marginality. We then compared normalized Ellenberg Indicator Values (EIVs) for Moisture, Reaction, Salinity, and Nutrients with measured soil variables [Volumetric Water Content, pH, salinity, ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-), and phosphate (PO43-) concentrations] using Linear regression. Moisture and salinity were key drivers of orchid distribution. Anacamptis laxiflora and Anacamptis palustris were associated with wet, saline environments, whereas Anacamptis pyramidalis and Anacamptis coriophora preferred drier, nutrient-poor soils. Anacamptis laxiflora exhibited highest marginality and narrowest niche breadth, indicating high specialization. In contrast, Ophrys apifera showed lowest marginality and highest tolerance, reflecting its generalist strategy and adaptability to a broad range of soil conditions. EIV-Moisture and EIV-Salinity showed strong correlations with field measurements, whereas EIV-Nutrients and EIV-Reaction were less predictive. These findings emphasize the importance of conserving environmental heterogeneity, especially in human-dominated ecosystems, to support both generalist and specialist orchid species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.