ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Prediction of bacterial protein-compound interactions with only positive samples.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do papers tell the whole story? A benchmark and framework for uncovering hidden implementation gaps in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CholBindNet as an interpretable neural network for cholesterol-binding site classification.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- CholBindNet: Interpretable Neural Networks for Cholesterol Binding Site Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPrediction of Compound-Protein Interactions (CPI) in bacteria is crucial to advance various pharmaceutical and chemical engineering fields, including biocatalysis, drug discovery, and industrial processing. However, current CPI models cannot be applied for bacterial CPI prediction due to the lack of curated negative interaction samples.
resultsWe propose a novel Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning framework, named BIN-PU, to address this limitation. BIN-PU generates pseudo positive and negative labels from known positive interaction data, enabling effective training of deep learning models for CPI prediction. We also propose a weighted positive loss function that weights to truly positive samples. We have validated BIN-PU coupled with multiple CPI backbone models, comparing the performance with the existing PU models using bacterial cytochrome P450 (CYP) data. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of BIN-PU over the benchmark models in predicting CPIs with only truly positive samples. Furthermore, we have validated BIN-PU on additional bacterial proteins obtained from literature review, human CYP datasets, and uncurated data for its reproducibility. We have also validated the CPI prediction for the uncurated CYP data with biological and biophysical experiments. BIN-PU represents a significant advancement in CPI prediction for bacterial proteins, opening new possibilities for improving predictive models in related biological interaction tasks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data are available at https://github.com/datax-lab/CYP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.