Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706645›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Awareness and use of flavor accessories for combustible tobacco products: A 2024 cross-sectional survey of high school students in Connecticut, USA.

Christina N Kyriakos, Krysten W Bold, Meghan E Morean, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Danielle R Davis, Grace Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina N KyriakosDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0486-9152
Krysten W BoldDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Meghan E MoreanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-1155
Suchitra Krishnan-SarinDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Danielle R DavisDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Grace KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceFlavor accessories (e.g., flavor capsules), which are separate products that can be used with combustible tobacco products to alter their flavor, are on the market. These new products may bypass flavor restrictions and appeal to youth, yet no research has examined US youth awareness or use of flavor accessories. This study aimed to examine awareness and use of flavor accessories among a sample of youth in the US.

methodsA school-based survey of 4,760 Connecticut high school students (mean age = 15.9, SD = 1.2) was conducted in April-May 2024. All youth reported on awareness of flavor accessories (i.e., flavor capsules, sprays/drops, cards). Youth who had ever used combustible tobacco products (i.e., cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos) or cannabis blunts, which are all products that can be used with flavor accessories (N = 868), also reported on ever use of flavor accessories. Differences in awareness by ever product user type (i.e., exclusive combustible tobacco (n = 173), exclusive blunt (n = 461), dual tobacco and blunt (n = 234)) were assessed using Bonferroni-corrected chi-square tests.

resultsOverall, 22.9% of youth were aware of at least one type of flavor accessory. Among ever users of combustible tobacco or blunts, awareness of at least one type of flavor accessory was 32.8%, with awareness most common for flavor capsules (19.6%), followed by sprays/drops (16.3%), and cards (9.5%). Among this group, more dual users of combustible tobacco and blunts were aware of at least one type of flavor accessory compared to exclusive users of combustible tobacco (44.1% vs 26.3%, p = 0.002) and compared to exclusive users of blunts (44.1% vs 30.8%, p = 0.005). Among ever users of combustible tobacco or blunts, ever use of any flavor accessory was 7.6%, ranging from 4.7% for flavor capsules, 3.5% for sprays/drops, and 2.7% for cards.

conclusionsNearly one-quarter of a sample of Connecticut high school youth were aware of flavor accessories, with differences in awareness by product user groups, although ever use of these products was lower. Continued monitoring of flavor accessories is critical for informing regulatory actions and interventions.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsStudentsTobacco ProductsAdolescentConnecticutCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesFlavoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID41706645
PMCPMC12915970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.