SynthesisClinical rehabilitation2026
The effect of robot-assisted gait training on physical activity outcomes in people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The evidence landscape, clinical role, and mechanisms of action of robot-assisted injury treatment: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo summarise the evidence for changes in physical activity outcomes during robot-assisted gait training in patients with spinal cord injury.Data sourcesThe Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Central, Medline, Scopus and SportDiscus databases were searched in August 2025 for studies that recorded ≥1 physical activity outcome during robot-assisted gait training.Review methodsData were synthesised according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale or the Revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-Randomised Studies. Certainty of evidence was established following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. The report followed the Preferring Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsThirty studies (638 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Quality of the randomised studies ranged from 'Fair' to 'Good', while there was high risk of bias for all non-randomised studies in ≥1 domain. Robot-assisted gait training significantly improved physical activity outcomes (up time, walk time, walk distance, walk speed and number of steps) over time, though these findings were constrained by very low certainty of evidence.ConclusionUp time, walk time, walk distance, walk speed, and number of steps were significantly improved across the robot-assisted gait training period for patients with spinal cord injury. Robot-assisted gait training during rehabilitation for people following spinal cord injury is a useful adjunct to support independence and improved walking ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.