Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706592›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026

A Comparative Study Between Denervation and Extensor Release for Management of Resistant Tennis Elbow.

Muhammad Abdelmoneim Quolquela

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammad Abdelmoneim QuolquelaFrom the Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0005-2625-8223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtensor tendon release for tennis elbow is fraught with complications as persistence of pain because of adhesions together with weakness of wrist extension. Denervation of the epicondylar region through division of branches of posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm (PCNF) was proposed to alleviate pain without drawbacks of tendon release.

methodsThe first group included 19 patients treated through dividing PCNF. The second group included 23 patients treated through tendon release. Inclusion criteria included symptoms for 6 months or longer. Clinical diagnosis was based on positive resisted wrist extension and resisted forearm pronation tests. Division of branches of PCNF in the denervation group and release of extensor carpi radialis brevis tendinous origin in the release group were done.

resultsThe follow-up was 37 months. In the denervation group, 17 patients (92%) reported no pain compared with 15 patients (67%) in the release group. In the denervation group, hand grip strength had an average of 72 lb (91%) compared with 63 lb (77%) for the release group (P = 0.04). Patients of the denervation group had an average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 95 points compared with 87 for the release group (P = 0.37).

conclusionDenervation of the elbow for management of tennis elbow is a simple safe procedure.

Indexed as

DenervationTendonsTennis ElbowAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41706592
PMCPMC12915731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.