ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Aqueous Two-Phase Bioinks for Discrete Packing and Compartmentalization of 3D Bioprinted Cells.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aqueous Two-Phase Bioinks for Discrete Packing and Compartmentalization of 3D Bioprinted Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unparalleled ability of aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) to reproduce microscale cellular and biomaterial compartmentalization to selectively modulate cell behavior and functionality is ideal for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) purposes. Herein, we introduce new ATPS biomaterial inks for 3D bioprinting of water-in-water (W/W) emulsions, enabling precise cellular crowding for tissue regeneration in vitro and ex vivo. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) was dispersed in an alginic acid phase depending on sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration (0-36 g/L). Emulsion droplet size (12.8 ± 2.6-52.4 ± 11.4 µm) influenced degradation and spatial cell localization (A549, C2C12, MG63). A microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting approach allowed fine-tuning of fiber structure adjusting ATPS deposition by modulating flow rates and printing speed. Rheological properties supported the findings of the two-phase partitioning, aiding the selection of the ATPS ink formulation for functional cell-laden construct fabrication. Encapsulation of C2C12 cells revealed enhanced cytoskeletal remodeling at higher salt concentrations. Increased GelMA phase promoted human bone marrow stromal cells (HBMSCs) crowding, mineral deposition and skeletal differentiation. In ovo studies demonstrated degradation control and vascular infiltration via salt modulation. Altogether, ATPS bioinks offer a versatile platform for the assembling of complex, hierarchical tissues with microscale precision, expanding biofabrication strategies for TERM applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.