Trial reportJAMA dermatology2026
Three-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes From Bimekizumab for Plaque Psoriasis: The BE RADIANT Randomized Clinical Trial With Open-Label Extension.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03536884 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Secukinumab-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Secukinumab-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunopathogenesis of itch: an integrative framework for chronic pruritus.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments alongside clinical parameters help to holistically determine treatment benefits. Objective: To assess PROs among bimekizumab-treated patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The BE RADIANT multicenter, phase 3b randomized clinical trial and open-label extension (OLE) had a 48-week double-blinded period and 96-week OLE (3 years' total treatment). Patients initially received bimekizumab or secukinumab. At year 1 (week 48/OLE entry), bimekizumab-randomized patients continued bimekizumab treatment (continuous bimekizumab-treated patients) and secukinumab-randomized patients switched to bimekizumab (secukinumab/bimekizumab-treated patients). Interventions: Continuous bimekizumab-treated patients received bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 4 weeks to week 16, then every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks to 1 year and into the OLE. Secukinumab/bimekizumab-treated patients received secukinumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks to 1 year, then switched to bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks. All received bimekizumab every 8 weeks by week 64. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported itching/skin pain/scaling (Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure [P-SIM]) and concurrent achievement of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores are reported (nonresponder imputation to 1 year; modified nonresponder imputation to 1-3 years). Results: A total of 373 bimekizumab-treated and 370 secukinumab-treated patients were randomized at baseline; 336 and 318, respectively, entered the OLE. Among bimekizumab-randomized and secukinumab-randomized patients, 127 (34.0%) and 93 (25.1%) reported no itching; 278 (74.5%) and 222 (60.0%) no skin pain; and 172 (46.1%) and 80 (21.6%) no scaling at week 4, respectively; at year 1, rates remained higher in bimekizumab-randomized vs secukinumab-randomized patients (itching: 227 [60.9%] vs 178 [48.1%]; nominal P < .001; skin pain: 293 [78.6%] vs 262 [70.8%]; nominal P = .01; scaling: 263 [70.5%] vs 184 [49.7%]; nominal P < .001). Bimekizumab-randomized patients had greater concurrent achievement rates of PASI = 0 and DLQI 0/1 vs secukinumab-randomized patients (week 4: 43 [11.5%] vs 17 [4.6%]; nominal P < .001; year 1: 230 [61.7%] vs 158 [42.7%]; nominal P < .001). In patients entering the OLE, high P-SIM = 0 rates were maintained to year 3. At OLE entry, concurrent achievement of PASI = 0 and DLQI 0/1 was reported in 69.2% continuous bimekizumab-treated and 48.5% secukinumab/bimekizumab-treated patients. After switching, secukinumab/bimekizumab responses increased, and high rates were maintained to year 3 for both continuous bimekizumab and secukinumab/bimekizumab (62.2% and 63.8%, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial and OLE, bimekizumab rapidly and durably improved symptoms/health-related quality of life to 3 years, demonstrating that clinical efficacy translates to quality of life improvements. Secukinumab-randomized patients reported improvements on switching to bimekizumab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03536884.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.