Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706397›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Optimizing profitability in dual-purpose Assaf sheep farms: management effects under natural and artificial suckling in Palestine.

Muayad Salman, Medhat Wild Ali, Hajer Guesmi, Ikram Bensouf, Naceur M'Hamdi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muayad SalmanLaboratory of Animal, Genetic and Feed Resources (LRGAA), National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia. moayednas@yahoo.com.
Medhat Wild AliLaboratory of Animal, Genetic and Feed Resources (LRGAA), National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia.
Hajer GuesmiLaboratory of Research on Ecosystems and Aquatic Resources, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia.
Ikram BensoufLaboratory of Animal, Genetic and Feed Resources (LRGAA), National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia.
Naceur M'HamdiLaboratory of Animal, Genetic and Feed Resources (LRGAA), National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis, 1082, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the productive, reproductive and economic performance of Assaf sheep farms operating in arid Mediterranean conditions and how farm location, suckling practice (natural or artificial) and lamb marketing strategy (weaning or fattening) influence net revenue. Data from 520 ewes on farms located in the governorates of Jenin, Jericho, Tubas and Tulkarm were analysed in this study. A cross-sectional survey was carried out on the ewes, with standardized annual data collected for each ewe, including production traits, input costs and revenues, using farm records and structured questionnaires. Artificial suckling reduced lamb mortality compared with natural suckling (0.02% versus 0.08%, P < 0.05). Farms using artificial suckling also achieved higher annual prolificacy, producing 2.21 lambs per ewe per year compared with 2.06 in naturally suckled flocks. Feed constituted the major production expense and accounted for 73% of total costs. The highest net revenue was obtained on farms that combined artificial suckling with fattening of lambs, reaching 828USD per ewe per year. Farm location had a significant effect on profitability (P < 0.01), driven mainly by differences in feed costs and access to local markets. These results indicate that targeted management interventions can substantially improve productivity and farm income in dual-purpose sheep systems.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandrySheep, DomesticAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimals, SucklingCross-Sectional StudiesFarmsFemaleMiddle EastReproductionSheepWeaningArtificial sucklingFeed costsLamb fatteningNet revenueWest bank

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.